Patrick Thompson. Mark Parker. John Hilton. Dawn Wilcox.
The Blood of Others
Kevin A Congdon. Salvador Manzo. Rexx Arkana. Michael McConnell. Johnathan Zamacona.
- Quatre-vingt Treize (French Edition).
- Snakes! A Kids Book About Snakes - Fun Facts & Amazing Pictures About the Python, Anaconda, Viper & More (eBooks Kids Nature 6);
- Fire Meridian/An Ocean | I Die: You Die.
- Blood type and pregnancy?
- The Blood of Others () - IMDb.
Arthur C. Gregory McClintock. Davide Pappalardo. Purchasable with gift card. Limited edition of , only 25 will be sold online. Sold Out. The Blood of Others - Part I Limited Cassette run of Only 25 will be sold online. Purchase digital versions from the artist's Bandcamp pages: slve. Subtract at Studio Flesh.
It delves deeply into the problems with class, political power, and philosophical disassociation of the time, while also managing to paint a heartrending but hopeful image of love. Simone de Beauvoir digs so deep into the psychology of her characters that at times it feels indecent. At times the characters act irrationally, even despicably at a few moments, in sea The Blood of Others is a startlingly evocative demonstration of the struggles of France leading into the Nazi invasion and armistice.
At times the characters act irrationally, even despicably at a few moments, in search of an end which is not always noble. Yet, the reader can't be angry at them because the reader understands that it was the only thing they could do. Too often, books which take place in this setting are written by Americans who have no relationship to the culture and the history that caused the attrocities. Books far too often focus on the travesty without addressing the actual psychological state of the country at the time, or understanding the role of communist thought in resisting fascism.
This book offers an extreme level of insight into what all of it actually meant for France, aside from all the other stunning aspects of this book, it's historical insight alone is enough to convince me that this book should be required reading for anyone attempting to understand the tensions in Europe of WWII. Dec 28, Laura rated it liked it Shelves: read-more-than-once. The Blood of Others was one of my favorite books in college.
I read it many many times. I enjoyed re-reading it last year, but it was very different than I remembered it. The writing was self-indulgent and the characters kind of annoying. The ideas behind the plot were interesting, but the main character is almost paralyzed by his fear of interfering with someone else's life and it wasn't believable. Just get over yourself. The idea of whose blood do you spill and whose do you save is an interes The Blood of Others was one of my favorite books in college.
The idea of whose blood do you spill and whose do you save is an interesting and even powerful concept, and I found it thought-provoking in terms of war it's placed in Paris before and during WWII , but in terms of relationships, it was crazy. You don't spend your life with someone out of pity, and you don't spurn someone to stay uninvolved. You love who you love. At least when you are young and unattached and deciding those things. I thought it was interesting too, that her lead male character was so complex and her lead female character was so two-dimensional.
I know the idea was that the girl grew and changed and became more than she was, but you don't really see it until she is on her deathbed that's not a spoiler because she is on her deathbed on page 1 and the rest of the book is written in flashbacks. What a whirlwind. Yes, I read this in 8 hours or less: desperate end of semester times call for desperate measures. Did I enjoy it? Not until the last quarter of the book, so a more accurate review would be 2. The themes are extremely important and if there had been more of a focus on the war and the Resistance, it would have been fascinating.
However, the characters were odious and they made the storytelling miserable. Jan 15, Julie Rylie rated it really liked it Shelves: strongly-recommend. Simone is brilliant.
I love the way she writes, it's so poetical. At the beginning I thought I was not going to fancy the plot so much, it seemed just chitty chat about the complications of entangled love lives but as it moves further you understand the context all of this was written on WWII, the occupation of France by the nazis and the revolutionary communism and it makes it all so freaking interesting.
It's amazing to see how Hel Simone is brilliant. It's amazing to see how Helene's character grows and grows throughout the novel and how she starts to recognize that her life can be of such value to help a cause. Dec 01, Michelle added it Shelves: abandoned. I'm reading The Beav.
Jun 18, Steven Bartley rated it liked it. I did not really like the ending, but I do like the characters. The story is about 2 lonely and shy people, who find each other because of a terrible crime. The author keeps them true to character.
How your blood is used
Like the Mandarins, well worth reading, though the existentialist project is more deliberate. Nov 09, Lucinda Elliot rated it it was amazing Shelves: re-reads. This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. I gather that Simone de Beauvoir was highly critical of this novel, and thought the characters flat. By contrast, I found they came startlingly to life for me, introspective and given to effortless discussion on Existentialist themes as they are. This improbability is never explained. Overall, though, I found it a wonderful read; and what I love most of all is that at the end not only do the estranged heroine and hero at last discover each other emtionally, but all the main characters realize their own worth through involvement in a cause greater than themselves — the French Resistance.
This novel is of course, an exploration of the issues of personal responsibility and the consequences of individual action and inaction in the context of the build up to World War II, the Nazi invasion, and the activities of the French Resistance. Jean is a man who seems emotionally frozen, and who finds any sort of action a cause of tortured self doubt.
ONE THIRD OF BLOOD DONATIONS HELP TREAT PEOPLE WITH CANCER
Similarly, though, he finds any inaction equally subject to moral scruples; all this leads to his cautious life of rebellion against his bourgeois upbringing. However, though his intentions are good, his treatment of her is cold and oblivious. He drives her, immature and infatuated as she is, to despair and a self-destructive love affair with a man described by her friend as a 'dirty brute'.
She is in fact an artist, though she works sometimes in the family confectionary. When we first see her she is deciding to steal a bicycle she covets, and at first her feelings for Jean are of the same order though emotionally repressed, his sexual attraction comes clearly through the text. In fact, given her wild charm, physical attractions and adoring attitude towards him, it would probably be quite hard for a man not to fall for her, and it seems obvious to me, if not to all readers, that he loves her all along.
Therefore, it seems to me that to criticise this book for having characters who are less than wholly sympathetic is besides the point. They are meant to be - in their varying ways - inadequate. I found this part of the book particularly moving.
Upgrade to remove ads
I wish de Beauvoir had given us a bit more of a description of this happiness, as she gave us a fairly detailed one of their emotional separation. Not escapism, you see. Aug 29, Curiosity rated it really liked it. I really enjoyed this book! What an emotional reading. A plot twisted love story in war time German-occupied France with existentialism and philosophy on love and life at the background. Although the writing style was quite challenging, telling story in two different perspectives, but it really rewarded at the end and I really appreciate de Beauvoir's creative composition, I get to exercise my brain muscle for the time shifting narration.
This book surprised me in so many ways especially "love", I guess cuz I don't read love story as much. Her character development is very interesting. At the end, I really respect who she became. She existed with him, with Marcel, with Madaleine, Laurent, Yvonne, with all the unknown human beings who slept in wooden huts and who never heard her name, with all those who longed for a different tomorrow, even with those who did not know how to long for anything. The shell had burst open; she existed for something, for someone. The whole earth was one fraternal unity.
I'm still debating with myself whether I'll see the film adaptation of this book or not. I have just read this - incredibly unusually for me - for the third time.